Public transport

Are thither more than advantages or disadvantages to this change? In many countries around the human race there is considerable debate about the role of frequent transport. whiz suggestion that is comm save put forward is that it should be made apologize of charge. My belief is that while this policy might be difficult to use in practice, there are at least two fast reasons for considering it.The ne significant problem with making public transport abandon of charge is financial. Councils and local governments need sufficient revenue not only to pay bus tauntrs and other ancillary staff, but also to detect the transport infrastructure. There is a real danger that allowing people to proceed for set down would deprive transport authorities of much needed cash and lead to a lower standard of service. This financial difficulty in free public transport is counterbalanced by a potence benefit to the nvironment.The fact that so many people use cars present means that our cities are suffer from rising levels of pollution from car ingest emissions. One way to address this problem would be to encourage more people to use buses and trains by abolishing fares. If more commuters chose to travel to work on public transport, our cities would almost certainly be cleaner places to live in. other way in which free public transport could improve our choice of life relates to congestion.Currently, the trend is for increasing numbers of people to choose to drive to work. This means that in many cases the rush hour is several hours coarse and it is sometimes almost out of the question to travel across a city. It is likely that this level of congestion would be reduced by making public transport free. My conclusion is then that there are more advantages than disadvantages to free public transport, but this policy may be financially impossible to implement.