Thinking About Stupidity In Our Scholars :: essays research papers

The stupidity in our scholars, like stupidity and arrogance everywhere, fol crusheds a model. The model presented here was developed by Anticommerical University Professor William Mason. It applies in universal to stupidity at any level of intensity. It has 5 stages.1. Mimetic ArroganceOne ships company identifies themselves as an authority on a subject and other parties practise that arrogance. Examples of things scholars and professors atomic number 18 arrogant about science, literature, art, sociology, psychology, philosophy. Whatever the culture tells us is a difficult subject, thats what scholars decide is worth being arrogant about.2. Mimetic use of goods and services of the Word MimeticNow the parties begin competing for the object of arrogance jargon. Whatever big, fancy talking to emerge, others copy them. Since they all use the same terms in varied ways, any hope of finding concrete definitions of them vanishes. To win, you only need to engage more exclusivity of words such as exclusivity. If the word becomes ubiquitous, then you harbour up even more complex words that have uncomplicated meanings, such as ubiquitous. If this doesnt work, then you must resort to using neojargon or pseudojargon or neopseudojargon or neopseudoneojargon. Examples of these forms of jargon are the prefixes neo and pseudo.3. GraikosGraikos is a Greek word that means "Greek." Its the root of much stupidity found in studious discursions. In the rivalry for respect, if one billet finds an inferior usage of jargon, they are caught in the temptation of Graikos and feeling compelled to retaliate by literally speak a whole new language. Thus begins a "jargon" war, fought on the battlefield of the dictionary. Graikos is what makes it so ambitious to read their professional journals, so hard to feel like you have any grasp whatsoever on vocabulary. Its so easy to feel intellectually inferior to such indefensible usage of language. The gap between sc holar and layman escalates.4. IntimidationEventually one side crosses some arbitrary threshold of concern where the supervising authorities feel compelled to intervene. Its essentially random which side is engageed the "supervising authority" since they both consider the other as worthless scum, but often its the faction with more college degrees, which uses more venomous attacks to maintain parity. Whichever side is considered the "supervising authority" becomes the intimidator of the layman and the others who kept their ego below threshold are victims, doomed to low self-esteem and feelings of worthlessness.5. Authorized, Sanctioned and Sacred StupidityTo appease the scholars, the authorities determine unrighteousness and visit sanctions and punishment on the intimidated.